From Friends to Foes: The US–Iran Rivalry that Dates Back to 1979

Rashid Khalidi, a Palestinian historian, in his 2020 article The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonial Conquest and Resistance, 1917-2017, argued that the British and American colonial ambitions were profoundly inspired by Zionist aspirations to rule Palestine for centuries. Accordingly, this conflict between the United States and Iran is hardly a single war. It is a long awaited and complicated struggle that is shaped by politics, ideology and various dynamics of power. These notions came into play nearly 47 years ago, making a prolonged chapter, known as “Fifty-Year War.”

Let’s go back to 1979 when Iran’s unstable political climate started with the overthrown of one of America’s most trusted clients in the Middle East, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. Shah was described as “a ruler with dictatorial powers, a massive military and delusions of grandeur.” America ignored US diplomats who questioned this over-reliance the US had with Iran and Shah, on the other hand, silenced everyone who called for political change. This whole chapter was followed by the 1979 Islamic Revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini who caused a massive shift in regional politics and ideologies, instantly transforming Iran from a key US ally to an adversary. He labelled the US the “Greater Satan” and called the seizing of the US Embassy in Tehran, severing all the diplomatic ties and creating the 1979-1981 hostage crisis. His rhetoric was entirely anti-American.

1979-1981 hostage crisis

In the same year, Iraq became another triggering point for this ever-escalating war. It began with Saddam Hussein becoming the president of Iraq where he theatrically saw both Israel and revolutionary Iran as hindrance to his ambitions towards pan-Arab leadership. He launched a “full-scale invasion” of Iran that lasted for eight years, resulting in devastating economic and societal contractions in both sides but Iraq was facing greater repercussions.

In the Iraq-Iran war, the US secretively supported Iraq, providing intelligence, chemical weapons and financial aid. They defined Khomeini’s revolutionary Iran as a great threat to regional oil stability. They also propagated Iran as a state that sponsors terrorism. This amplified the enmity between Iran and the US.

Iran had denied Israel rights to even exist since the 1979 revolution. Their motto since then was “Death to Israel.” It was at this time that Israel was considered one of the greatest allies of the US, leading Iran to despise Israel even more. Thus, the Islamic Republic was concerned that both the US and Israel brought existential threat to Iran. They, therefore backed a network of well-armed groups where they spread their ideologies and expanded influence. These groups that were collectively known as the “Axis of Resistance,” included Hezbollah (Lebanon), the Houthis (Yemen), Hamas/Palestinian Islamic Jihad (Gaza), and various militias in Iraq, with strategic state relationships with Russia.

With this expansion of power, Iran could develop a Nuclear weapons program in which they repeatedly reported that this program was solely based in peaceful purposes for its citizens. The US considered this a terrorist activity in the Middle East, yet again heightening the rivalry between them.

Then a breakthrough came in 2015 when Iran, along with several other world leaders including the US, signed an agreement to limit its Nuclear program. This agreement was formally know as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Before this, Iran had signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in July 1968 and ratified it in February 1970 while accepting International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections. Somehow this JCPOA agreement enabled reconciliation between the two nations, allowing Iran to open its facilities to more extensive international inspections in exchange for billions of dollars’ worth of sanctions relief.

Iran Nuclear Deal

This fell apart as President Trump removed the US from this agreement, stating, “we have definitive proof that this Iranian promise was a lie. Last week, Israel published intelligence documents long concealed by Iran, conclusively showing the Iranian regime and its history of pursuing nuclear weapons.” in his first presidency in 2018.

Then, in 2019, the US accused Iran of attacking oil tankers in the Gulf of Oman. In response to the accusations, Iran issued a statement, calling the US and its allies to put an end to mischievous plots and false flag operations in the region.

In 2020, Iran’s top military commander, General Qasem Soleimani, was assassinated in a U.S. drone strike. The US claimed that Soleimani was behind attacks on Americans in the region.

In 2023, Hamas, a long-term ally of Iran which was considered a terrorist organization by the US, launched an attack on Israel from Gaza Stripe, killing about 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. This resulted in a massive Israel military attack in Gaza which killed tens of thousands of Palestinians. This attack left Hamas extremely defenseless. Though Iran denied any involvement in the Hamas attack on Israel, they publicly supported the actions of Hamas.

The Palestinian group, Hamas launching an attack on Israel

In June, 2025, the UN’s Nuclear watchdog said that Iran had breached its agreement on limiting the Nuclear program under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Yet, Iran repeatedly claimed that they had never developed a Nuclear weapon.

After this, Israel launched a series of strikes in Iran, resulting in a 12 day war. The US was also directly involved in the war with air strikes on Iranian Nuclear facilities.

In September 2025, the UN reimposed severe UN sanctions, following the E3‘s (France, Germany, UK) move due to Iran not following the agreed rules about nuclear activities.

What are these sanctions?

These are serious economic and political restrictions, such as:

  • Freezing Iran’s money/assets
  • Banning arms trade
  • Limiting nuclear activities
  • Blocking trade and financial dealings

After the sanctions, Iran faced economic hardship, global isolation and growing dissatisfaction among its citizens who often demanded political change in the country. They chanted slogans against the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei yet thousands of these protesters ended up getting killed on the streets. While President Trump expressed support on these protesters and warned Iran not to act on violence, Ayatollah Khomeini, blamed the US President for the protests and deaths. It is after this Khomeini was killed on February 28, 2026, in an attack by Israel and the United States.

Iran’s severely damaged Nuclear program which was attacked by the US

In the end, the long-standing war between America and Iran has no easy solution. Though strikes may slow each side’s ambitions, they are seemingly not capable of resolving deeper political, economic and social issues within either country.

But what should not go unnoticed is that the US and Iran have been fighting with each other for decades and it is driven not only by Iran’s alleged possession of Nuclear weapons but also by broader and more complicated diplomatic, economic, cyber, political and espionage tensions between the two nations.





The Surprising Books Charlotte Brontë Loved and the Ones She Couldn’t Stand

We often imagine that great authors admire all the classics around them, but Charlotte Brontë, best known for Jane Eyre, had very strong and sometimes unexpected opinions about the books she read. Through her letters and personal writings, we see that she openly praised some novels while strongly criticizing others. Her reactions were honest and passionate, revealing how seriously she took storytelling, imagination, and emotional depth in literature.

Among the novels she admired was Vanity Fair by William Makepeace Thackeray. She appreciated its sharp social commentary and the unforgettable character of Becky Sharp, a clever and ambitious woman navigating the strict social world of Victorian England.

Brontë also admired David Copperfield by Charles Dickens, praising its emotional depth and the way Dickens portrayed the struggles and growth of the main character from childhood to adulthood.

Another novel she respected was Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe, which deeply moved readers with its powerful story about slavery and human suffering.

Other favorites included Mary Barton by Elizabeth Gaskell, which explores the harsh lives of factory workers in industrial England, Uncle Tom’s Cabin by Harriet Beecher Stowe, a powerful anti-slavery novel that moved readers across the world, and Madeleine, a Tale of Auvergne by Julia Kavanagh, a historical story about the life of a peasant girl in France. These works impressed Brontë with their emotional intensity, realism, and social insight.

However, Brontë’s opinions were not always positive. She famously disliked Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen, describing it as lacking passion and imagination. While many readers love the novel for its wit and social observation, Brontë felt it was too restrained and emotionally distant.

She also disliked The Emigrant Family: or, The Story of an Australian Settler by Alexander Harris, feeling that it merely copied reality without creativity.

Other novels she criticized include Oliver Weld by Harriet Martineau, Modeste Mignon by Honoré de Balzac, and Azeth the Egyptian by Eliza Lynn Linton. In her view, these books either lacked originality, emotional depth, or the imaginative power she believed great literature should have.

She also found little interest in The Caxtons: A Family Picture by Edward Bulwer-Lytton, believing it did not offer the intensity or depth she valued in literature.

Somehow, these strong opinions tell us that even literary legends have their own unique tastes and sometimes they disagree with what the world later calls a masterpiece.

Sources: https://www.mentalfloss.com/literature/authors/novels-charlotte-bronte-loved-loathed

Also Read:

A/L Pressure Is Real But So Is Your Potential

For many Sri Lankan students, the Advanced Level (O/L) exams feel like the single most important moment in life. Weeks of late-night studying, endless past papers, and pressure from tuition teachers and family build up to a few hours in an exam hall. The tension is real. The stress is heavy. And the weight of expectations can feel crushing.

When the exams are over, a strange mix of relief and anxiety takes over. Some students celebrate immediately, while others replay every mistake in their minds. Even if you gave your best, you might feel unsure, insecure, or “not good enough.”

Here’s the truth: the pressure you feel is real but so is your potential. And the difference between feeling stuck and moving forward lies in perspective, mindset and action.

Your A/Ls Don’t Define Who You Are

It’s easy to assume that a set of exam marks determines your intelligence, your worth, or your future. In Sri Lanka, this idea is reinforced everywhere, from conversations at home to casual comments at school.

But the truth is, O/L results are just one measure of performance under exam conditions. They don’t capture your creativity, problem-solving skills, resilience, or ability to learn from mistakes. These qualities are what truly shape your future. Your potential is far bigger than any grade.

Pause Before Big Decisions

Immediately after A/Ls, many students feel rushed to make choices about foundation courses or career paths. The pressure to decide can be overwhelming.

Instead of acting impulsively, pause and reflect. Ask yourself:

  • Which subjects genuinely interest me?
  • What kind of career or lifestyle do I see for myself?
  • Which skills do I want to develop over the next few years?

This pause isn’t wasting time; it’s an investment in your potential. Thoughtful decisions now will create better opportunities later.

Build Skills That Go Beyond Marks

Even if your results weren’t perfect, your potential can be realized by building skills that grades can’t capture. Consider:

  • Improving English communication skills through writing, reading, and conversation
  • Learning digital skills like coding, graphic design, or social media management
  • Participating in clubs, volunteer work, or creative projects
  • Developing hobbies that enhance problem-solving and creativity

By investing in these skills, you’re creating opportunities that no exam score can measure.

It’s tempting to compare yourself to friends who excelled in A/Ls. But remember: everyone’s journey is different. Some students who struggled now thrive in university, business, or creative fields. Others who excelled may later discover their strengths lie elsewhere.

Focus on yourself. Take small, consistent actions to grow, learn, and improve. Your potential unfolds through effort, persistence, and smart decisions, not by waiting for external validation.

Remember: the students who move forward, even when they feel uncertain, are the ones who ultimately succeed.

University Degree vs Skill-Based Courses: Which One Really Wins Today?

The world of work is changing fast. By 2026, employers are rethinking what they value most in candidates, not just degrees, but practical, job-ready skills. So if you’re planning your education or career path, which matters more: a traditional university degree or focused skill-based courses? Here’s a simple, descriptive comparison to help you decide.

1) Employer Priorities: Credentials vs Real-World Ability

A university degree has long been the traditional benchmark for recruiters. It signals that a candidate has formal education, theoretical knowledge, and the discipline to complete a long program. For many industries, degrees are still a minimum requirement.

However, studies show that employers are increasingly prioritizing what candidates can actually do. According to surveys highlighted by Online Manipal, over 80% of companies now value practical experience, demonstrable skills, and project-based learning more than just having a degree. Skill-based courses, certifications, or even personal projects give candidates a clear way to showcase abilities that matter on the job.

A degree might get you noticed on paper, but skills make employers choose you.

2) Learning Speed and Relevance: Traditional vs Agile

Traditional degrees usually take three to five years, depending on the course. While this provides a broad understanding of a field, the curriculum often lags behind the rapid pace of technology and industry demands. Fields like digital marketing, AI, data analytics, or coding evolve so quickly that by the time students graduate, some tools and methods may already be outdated.

Skill-based courses, on the other hand, are usually short, focused, and designed around what the industry needs right now. They teach practical skills that can be applied immediately and often include live projects, case studies, or hands-on tasks. This makes learners job-ready in a fraction of the time it takes to finish a traditional degree.

If you want to enter fast-changing industries quickly, skill-based learning can give you a clear edge.

3) Future-Proofing Your Career: Combining Strengths

University degrees hold value, particularly for credibility, higher-level roles, or careers where formal education is required. They offer networking opportunities, exposure to a wide range of subjects, and structured learning.

Skill-based courses complement degrees by offering practical, demonstrable abilities. They allow learners to build portfolios, solve real-world problems, and show tangible results to employers. By 2026, the ideal path is often a hybrid approach: a degree for foundational knowledge, combined with skill-based courses for relevance and employability.

The strongest candidates in 2026 are those who combine formal education with practical skills, proving not just what they know, but what they can do.

In short, degrees open doors but skills determine whether you actually walk through them. In a competitive job market, being able to demonstrate real-world abilities is what sets you apart.

Sri Lanka’s 2026: Rule of Law and Drug-Free Future

“We are building a country where no child becomes a victim of the drug menace”, stated the President.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake delivered a powerful message during the Central Province launch of the “A Nation United” anti-drug campaign, emphasizing that this year will breathe life into the principle of equality before the law. He warned that when the rule of law collapses, it hands power to criminals, stifling national development and trapping citizens in poverty. This speech underscores a pivotal shift for Sri Lanka, blending anti-drug efforts with broader governance reforms.

The initiative, “A Nation United” rallies political leaders, tri-forces, police, and communities to eradicate drug networks through arrests, awareness drives, and rehabilitation programs. Key achievements include over 91,000 suspects apprehended, 1,818 held in long-term detention, and 1,566 individuals referred for rehab since its start. Notably, 62 police officers in Nuwara Eliya received commendations for their frontline efforts.

Educationally, this campaign teaches the ripple effects of drugs: they fuel street crime, breed corruption, and even infiltrate politics, eroding societal trust. By involving religious leaders, teachers, and parents, it promotes collective responsibility, showing young people that vigilance at home and school prevents addiction’s grip.

The President stressed that true equality means no one, regardless of status, escapes justice, a lesson drawn from past failures where impunity bred chaos. This principle isn’t just legal; it’s economic. A stable rule of law attracts investment, reduces crime-related costs, and empowers citizens to thrive. For students and educators, it’s a real-world civics lesson: strong institutions protect the vulnerable and pave the way for innovation.

Reflecting on recent crises like Cyclone Ditwah, which caused 4.1 billion US dollars in damage, the President highlighted funding reconstruction without new debt, a model of prudent governance. Future plans include a non-aligned foreign policy to safeguard sovereignty, a Rs. 330 billion public service salary increase for efficiency, and enhanced allowances for armed forces after 2027.

Related Reads:

Learn English Fast and Efficiently Without Expensive Classes

Learning English can feel overwhelming, especially when you’ve been studying it for years but still struggle to write and speak confidently. Many learners think they need expensive classes or perfect grammar to improve quickly. In reality, the fastest and most efficient way to learn English is by changing how you learn, not how much you study.

English is a skill, not a subject. And skills improve through use, exposure, and consistency.

One of the most effective ways to learn English fast is by surrounding yourself with it every day. This doesn’t mean studying textbooks for hours. It means turning English into part of your daily life. Watching videos, listening to podcasts, reading short articles, watching a movie/TV series and even scrolling through social media in English all help your brain get used to the language naturally. When you see and hear English often, your understanding improves without conscious effort.

Another key factor is focusing on communication rather than perfection. Many learners delay speaking because they’re afraid of making mistakes. This slows progress more than anything else. Fluency comes from practice, not accuracy. When you speak regularly, even with broken sentences, your brain learns to think in English instead of translating from your native language. Mistakes are not a sign of failure; they’re proof that learning is happening.

Consistency matters more than intensity. Studying English for ten minutes every day is far more effective than studying for three hours once a week. Daily exposure keeps the language fresh in your mind and helps vocabulary and sentence patterns stick. Small, regular habits build confidence faster than short bursts of motivation.

Learning English efficiently also means prioritizing the right skills. Many students spend too much time memorizing grammar rules that they rarely use. While grammar is important, listening and speaking should come first if your goal is real-world English. When you understand spoken English and can express your ideas, grammar improves naturally over time.

Using English actively is what accelerates learning. Writing short paragraphs, speaking to yourself, joining discussions, or even explaining ideas out loud forces your brain to organize thoughts in English. Passive learning alone, just reading or listening, is not enough. Active use turns knowledge into ability.

Finally, setting a clear purpose makes learning faster. Whether you want English for studies, work, travel, or online opportunities, knowing why you’re learning helps you focus on relevant vocabulary and situations. Purpose-driven learning is always more efficient than studying without direction.

Learning English fast isn’t about shortcuts. It’s about smart habits, daily exposure, and the courage to use the language before you feel ready. With the right approach, progress doesn’t take years , it starts showing in weeks.

Related Reads:

3 Smart Moves Every Student Should Make Before Their Final Year

For many students, the final year of the university feels overwhelming. Exams pile up, expectations rise, and suddenly the question: What’s next? arises. What often gets overlooked is that the most important decisions aren’t made in the final year itself, but in the time leading up to it.

Students who plan early don’t just reduce stress; they create options. These three smart moves can help you step into your final year feeling prepared, confident, and ahead of the curve.

The first move is learning to track opportunities early, rather than waiting until things feel urgent. Scholarships, internships, exchange programs, and grants usually open months in advance, and many students miss them simply because they start looking too late. By the time deadlines arrive, it’s already too late to gather documents, improve qualifications, or meet eligibility requirements.

When you begin paying attention early, you give yourself time. Time to prepare applications properly, time to improve your profile, and time to make informed decisions instead of rushed ones. This is why following reliable education platforms and staying aware of what’s available can quietly shape your future. Opportunity doesn’t always come loudly, sometimes it passes by unless you’re paying attention.

The second move is building a future-ready CV before you think you need one. Many students believe a CV is something you prepare only after graduation, once you have achievements worth showing. In reality, your CV grows alongside you. It reflects your effort, curiosity, and willingness to learn, not just your final results.

Even before your final year, your experiences already matter. Academic projects, volunteering, online learning, student initiatives, writing, research, or even managing a small personal project all show initiative. A future-ready CV tells decision-makers that you didn’t wait passively for success, you worked toward it. This mindset matters just as much as grades.

The third move is learning at least one practical skill that your classroom may not teach you. While formal education focuses heavily on exams and syllabi, real-world opportunities often depend on skills learned outside traditional lessons. Writing clearly, communicating confidently, using digital tools effectively or understanding how to research and think critically can give you a serious edge.

You don’t need to master everything. Choosing one skill and improving it steadily before your final year can make a noticeable difference in applications, interviews, and academic work. These skills don’t just help you after graduation; they support you throughout your studies.

Your final year should not be about scrambling to catch up. It should be a transition into the next phase of your life with clarity and confidence. Students who succeed aren’t always the ones with perfect results; they’re the ones who planned earlier and made thoughtful choices along the way.

Related Reads:

Discover Scholarships You Didn’t Know Existed!

1. Australia Awards Scholarships (Fully Funded)

Australia Awards Scholarships are prestigious fully funded scholarships offered by the Australian Government (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade) to students from eligible developing countries. These awards are designed to support long‑term study (undergraduate or postgraduate) in Australia and build skills to contribute to development in the recipients’ home countries.

What’s included:

  • Full tuition fees paid
  • Return economy‑class airfare
  • Living allowance (fortnightly stipend)
  • Establishment payment for accommodation/study materials
  • Health insurance (Overseas Student Health Cover)
  • Pre‑course English training (if needed)
  • Academic support & fieldwork assistance (for research students)

Application timeline:

2027 intake applications opened 1 Feb 2026 and close 30 April 2026 (check exact times for your country). Applicants must submit through the official Australia Awards portal (OASIS).

Who can apply:

Citizens of participating developing countries in the Indo‑Pacific region who want to pursue full‑time study in Australia in fields that support their country’s development goals.

Specific eligibility and deadlines vary by country.

Important: Visit the official page for the scholarship: Australia Awards Scholarships

2. Master Mind Scholarships (Flanders & Brussels, Belgium)

The Master Mind Scholarship is awarded by the Flemish Ministry of Education and Training to outstanding international students who want to pursue a master’s degree at a university or higher education institution in Flanders or Brussels (Belgium, part of Europe).

Scholarship Benefits

  • Grant of about €10,225 per academic year
  • Full tuition fee waiver at participating institutions
  • Scholarship supports one or two academic years depending on your master’s programme length (60 ECTS = 1 year; 120 ECTS = 2 years).

Who Can Apply (Eligibility)

  • You must be applying for a master’s programme at a Flemish higher education institution.
  • High academic performance, usually a GPA of around 3.5/4.0 or equivalent.
  • Proof of English proficiency (like IELTS or TOEFL) is required.
  • You must be accepted by the host university first to be considered for the scholarship.
  • All nationalities are eligible, including Sri Lankan students, but Russian citizens are excluded this year.
  • You cannot already be enrolled in a Flemish university (unless in a preparatory course).

Timeline & Process

  • The call for academic year 2026–2027 is now open.
  • You generally apply to your chosen university first before the institution nominates you for the scholarship.
  • Deadlines vary by university, often between Feb–Apr each year.

Important: Visit the official page for the scholarship: Master Mind Scholarship

3. Science@Leuven Scholarship (KU Leuven, Belgium)

The Science@Leuven Scholarship is a prestigious academic award offered by the Faculty of Science at KU Leuven to support outstanding international students who want to pursue a Master’s degree in selected science programmes at KU Leuven. It’s designed to attract top talent from around the world.

Who can apply:

International students of any nationality (including Sri Lankan students), you just need to meet the eligibility requirements and be applying for a qualifying Master’s programme at KU Leuven.

Eligible Master’s fields include:

  • Astronomy & Astrophysics
  • Biology
  • Biophysics, Biochemistry & Biotechnology
  • Chemistry
  • Mathematics
  • Physics
  • Statistics & Data Science
  • Sustainable Development
  • (Some fields may have specific conditions.)

Scholarship benefits:

  • €12,000 allowance per academic year (up to two years) to help with living costs.
  • Partial tuition fee reduction – for non‑EEA students, the remaining tuition fee can be significantly reduced (e.g., around €3,252.72 in 2026–27).

Application timeline:

  • Applications open: typically 1 October 2025
  • Deadline: 15 February 2026
  • To apply for the scholarship, you first apply for the Master’s programme, then include your admissions confirmation when submitting the scholarship application.

Basic eligibility requirements:

  • A Bachelor’s degree from a non‑Belgian institution
  • High academic performance comparable to Distinction
  • Strong English proficiency (e.g., IELTS 7.0 / TOEFL iBT 94+)
  • Motivation and letters of recommendation from professors
  • No previous Master’s or study/work experience at KU Leuven

Important: Visit the official page for the scholarship: Science@Leuven Scholarships

4. International Master’s Scholarships – Université Paris‑Saclay (France)

The International Master’s Scholarships programme at Université Paris‑Saclay in France supports outstanding international students (including Sri Lankan citizens) who want to pursue a Master’s degree at one of the university’s member institutions. All academic fields are eligible, and the scholarship encourages highly‑qualified students to join research‑oriented or regular Master’s programmes.

Eligibility

  • You must be a foreign national (non‑French) admitted to a Master’s programme at Université Paris‑Saclay before the scholarship deadline.
  • You must be under 30 years old in the year of application.
  • You should be enrolling in France for the first time in higher education (exceptions exist for certain short stays, language courses, or mobility exchanges).
  • You must not receive other funding exceeding €600/month (including other scholarships like Erasmus Mundus or France Excellence).

Sri Lankan students qualify as international applicants as long as they meet the criteria above and are admitted to a Master’s programme.

Scholarship Benefits

  • €10,000 per year (paid monthly for ~10 months of the academic year) to support living costs.
  • Up to €900 travel and visa support depending on your country of origin.
  • Scholarships are awarded for 1 year (M2) or 2 years (M1 + M2 with continuation).

Application Timing (Academic Year 2026–2027)

  • The deadline to be selected by your Master’s programme coordinator is 25 March 2026.
  • After being selected by the programme, the deadline to submit the scholarship application is 31 March 2026.
  • Results are expected mid‑May 2026.

Important: Visit the official page for the scholarship: International Master’s Scholarships Program

5. World Bank – JJ/WBGSP Scholarship (Joint Japan/World Bank Graduate Scholarship Program)

The JJ/WBGSP is a fully funded international scholarship for mid‑career professionals from developing countries who want to pursue a Master’s degree in development‑related fields at selected universities around the world.

Sri Lankan Eligibility

  • Sri Lanka is included on the list of eligible developing country nationals who can apply.
  • Applicants must not hold dual citizenship of any developed country.
  • You must be admitted unconditionally (except for funding) to one of the 44 participating master’s programmes before applying.
  • You must have at least 3 years of paid, development‑related work experience after your Bachelor’s degree, acquired within the past six years, and be currently employed full‑time in development‑related work.

This means recent graduates cannot apply immediately unless they have three years of relevant full‑time work experience.

Scholarship Benefits

JJ/WBGSP provides a strong financial package covering:

  • Full tuition fees for your master’s programme
  • Monthly living stipend to cover accommodation and daily costs
  • Round‑trip economy airfare between Sri Lanka and the host country
  • Health insurance through the university
  • Travel allowance (e.g., US $600 for departure and return)

These benefits typically cover up to 2 years of study or the duration of the programme, whichever is shorter.

Application Timelines (2026 Cycle)

There are two application windows for the 2026 cycle:

  • Window 1: January 15 – February 27, 2026
  • Window 2: March 30 – May 29, 2026

To apply, you must receive an unconditional admission offer to a participating master’s programme before submitting the scholarship application.

Post‑Study Commitment

If selected, scholars are expected to return to their home country after studies to use their skills toward national development.

Important: Visit the official page for the scholarship: World Bank Scholarships Program

Disclaimer / Note for Readers:

All scholarship details shared here are for informational purposes. Before applying, please visit the official scholarship websites to confirm eligibility, deadlines, and requirements. Links to official sources are included in each post. This ensures you have the most accurate and up-to-date information.

Will Sri Lanka’s New Anti-Drug Plan Save School Children or Just Fake It?

“Drug addicts should be referred to proper rehabilitation centers. Special attention must be paid to the environment around schools and the intervention of the Sri Lanka Police in this regard is extremely important.”

This statement was made during a meeting, attended by officials from the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol, the National Dangerous Drugs Control Board, and the Ministry of Education, to discuss the issuance of a new circular on school-related drug prevention for the year 2026.

Is this Reform necessary? Will it curb Drug Use or let it persist?

Sri Lanka faces a growing drug crisis, especially near schools, where youth vulnerability is high. The proposed 2026 circular emphasizing rehab referrals, school-zone monitoring, and police involvement sounds proactive. But is it truly necessary and will it ambush drug use or just prolong the problem? Let’s break it down with evidence from regional trends and global parallels.

The alarming context is that according to Sri Lanka’s National Dangerous Drugs Control Board (NDDCB), drug abuse among students has spiked and it is found that these drug-addicted schoolchildren are most prevalent in Sri Lanka’s Western Province with the majority of cases occurring in the Colombo region.

In 2024, arrests of youth possession according to Police data (2024) had a growing concern over the rise of synthetic drugs due to the reasons that there were no clear targeted reforms, schools became gateways and the quiet residential areas in Colombo turned into hotspots.

Then, these numbers changed into these in 2025 (January – July)

Source: Total number of persons arrested for drug-related offences

The two tables highlight one serious issue: the risk of children and urban adolescents being exposed to substances such as cannabis, heroin, and synthetic methamphetamine (ICE) continues to increase year after year, with no sign of decline, turning once-safe schools and neighbourhoods into targeted centres of drug transmission.

The Urgent Imperative

This initiative builds on past efforts. There were mandated awareness programs, initiatives and reforms but their enforcement lagged. A new reform for 2026, involving cross-agency collaboration (NDDCB, police, tobacco authority), tries to address these gaps by focusing on rehab over punishment, aligning with WHO guidelines. The focus of this imperative is holistic. The rehab referrals shift from criminalization to recovery, monitoring the above mentioned environments’ supply chains.

The meeting involved the National Authority on Tobacco and Alcohol (NATA), National Dangerous Drugs Control Board (NDDCB), and Education Ministry to draft a 2026 school-drug circular. This signals coordination especially with the inauguration of the National Mission ‘Ratama Ekata’ which can potentially handle the rising youth cases.

The Goal in Mind

Reforms like this often promise much but deliver little without teeth. One of the reasons why this could let drugs persist is the role of the police in controlling drugs through frequent raids that discourage local dealers. This effort is weakened by repeated corruption scandals such as the 2024 Navy methamphetamine trafficking cases which damage public trust and create perceptions of bias. At the same time, aggressive policing and raids can alienate vulnerable youth and push drug networks further underground.

Rehabilitation offers a more humane alternative by focusing on treatment rather than punishment. Yet access remains severely limited, with nationwide capacity at only about a few rehabilitation centres across the nation which ultimately questions rehabilitating every drug exposed is really possible and if these long waiting lists mean many referrals exist only on paper, not as real interventions.

Awareness campaigns aimed at protecting schools can help communities respond better, but the lack of dedicated funding for counseling leaves students exposed, making it harder to control through traditional policing.

Although the new circular calls for firm action, past experience raises concerns.

Police have reported that between January 1 and August 31, 2025,  206 children were taken into custody for drug-related offenses, though there were over 15,600 awareness programs being conducted to tackle the issue. This data reveals a troubling reality: previous initiatives often characterised by weak implementation of school drug prevention policies and limited involvement of principals and education offices may have contributed to worsening drug use among students.

This highlights the risk of repeating symbolic reforms without proper oversight, funding, and follow-through.

Therefore, before diving into these initiatives without considering their effects on the less visible aspects of society, it is imperative to conduct rigorous audits, provide teacher training, and implement community programs continuously to monitor both the decline and rise of drug use and to analyze ways in which these programs can be effectively implemented, not merely for the sake of doing so.

Five Costly Mistakes Students Make When Applying to Universities Abroad and How to Avoid Them

Studying abroad is a dream for millions of students. It all sounds exciting with new countries, world-class universities, better career prospects. But behind every successful overseas student story, there are dozens of failed or delayed applications caused by simple, avoidable mistakes.

We break down the five most common errors students make when applying to universities abroad, mistakes that quietly ruin chances, drain savings, and add unnecessary stress.

Starting too late

Many students underestimate how long applications really take, from preparing for language tests to gathering documents and writing personal statements. Rushing through the process often leads to weak applications that don’t reflect a student’s true potential. To avoid this, create a timeline that includes test dates, document preparation, recommendation letters, and visa planning; not just application submission.

Poor research

Choosing universities based only on rankings or reputation can backfire. Course structure, teaching style, location, visa rules, and post-study opportunities matter far more than most applicants realize.

Students often misjudge standardized tests, assume scholarships are “not for them,” or submit generic personal statements that fail to stand out in a competitive global pool. If you’re planning to study abroad, first understand how to apply smarter, earlier, and with confidence.

Underestimating Language and Entry Exams

Language and aptitude tests aren’t box-ticking exercises. They are competitive filters. Many students aim for the minimum score, not realizing that higher scores can dramatically improve admission and scholarship chances. Some even delay test preparation until deadlines are dangerously close, leaving no room for improvement.

Take a diagnostic test early to understand where you stand. Build time for weak areas (writing and speaking are common problems), a possible retake and score reporting delays. Think of test scores as leverage, stronger scores give universities more reasons to say yes.

Writing a Generic Personal Statement

Admissions officers read thousands of personal statements. They can instantly recognize copied templates, vague ambitions, and statements that could belong to any student applying anywhere. A weak personal statement doesn’t show who you are, what you want, or why the university should invest in you.

A strong personal statement answers three questions clearly:

  1. Why this field of study?
  2. Why this university and this course?
  3. Where do you want this degree to take you?

Personalize your statement. Show reflection, clarity, and purpose, not just achievements.

Ignoring Scholarships and Financial Planning

Many students believe scholarships are only for “top geniuses” or assume they won’t qualify. As a result, they don’t apply and lose out on funding that could significantly reduce costs. Others receive offers but later struggle with living expenses because they didn’t plan realistically.

Treat scholarships as part of your application strategy, not an afterthought. Look for:

  • University-specific awards
  • Government and country-based funding
  • External foundations and organizations

Even partial scholarships can ease pressure and improve your study experience.

Studying abroad is not just about intelligence or ambition. It’s about preparation, awareness, and smart decision-making. Every mistake listed here is common and every one of them is preventable.

Before submitting your applications, pause and ask yourself:
Am I applying carefully or just hoping for the best?

Sources: Times Higher Education – Five mistakes to avoid while applying to universities abroad

Explore our recent article: